Victoria Stilwell recent article is Dogs vs. Wolves and discusses the importance of getting away from comparing dogs to wolves. Victoria Stilwell “Many people assume that since dogs evolved from their wolf-like ancestors, we can and should easily draw parallels between the two species and use what we see in wolf behavior to help explain how to understand our domesticated dogs. Bad idea.”
Her article was timed well with another article Dog Behavior and Training – Dominance, Alpha, and Pack Leadership – What Does It Really Mean?
I have had experiences working with wolves and dogs. I do see a lot of similar behavior between the two. I have even gotten away from comparing dogs and wolves. I don’t like the dominance theory training where animals are hit, kicked, hanged, etc just to break their spirit and force them into submission. First off anyone knows that wolves don’t do this. As well anyone who is trained well knows that a wolf pack is a family containing a father, a mother, and their siblings. The Alpha and the Beta theory are long gone and is commonly used in the dominance theory on training dogs.
There is a lot of scientific proof that this type of training does more harm then good. The other reason why I have gotten away from this theory is because some raw feeders try to justify given only raw meat to their dogs by comparing them to wolves by claiming wolves only eat meat. YEA RIGHT! I have seen wolves eat vegetables, roots, and fruit.
There is a good article on Science Daily called Genomes of modern dogs and wolves provide new insights on domestication, which does mention that dogs and wolves did evolve from a common ancestor between 9,000 and 34,000 years ago. According to this article the genetic overlap with wolves and dogs is because of the interbreeding after the dog domestication not because of a direct line of descent from a one group of wolves.
It’s time to learn more about canine behavior especially within a family grouping and stop focusing on outdated information and theories.